Get the latest tech news

Stop Anthropomorphizing Intermediate Tokens as Reasoning/Thinking Traces


Intermediate token generation (ITG), where a model produces output before the solution, has become a standard method to improve the performance of language models on reasoning tasks. These intermediate tokens have been called \say{reasoning traces} or even \say{thinking traces} -- implicitly anthropomorphizing the traces, and implying that these traces resemble steps a human might take when solving a challenging problem, and as such can provide an interpretable window into the operation of the model's thinking process to the end user. In this position paper, we present evidence that this anthropomorphization isn't a harmless metaphor, and instead is quite dangerous -- it confuses the nature of these models and how to use them effectively, and leads to questionable research. We call on the community to avoid such anthropomorphization of intermediate tokens.

None

Get the Android app

Or read this on Hacker News

Read more on:

Photo of reasoning

reasoning

Photo of intermediate tokens

intermediate tokens

Photo of thinking traces

thinking traces

Related news:

News photo

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in the Wild Is Not Always Faithful

News photo

Claude Code returns blank thinking blocks, but reasoning still costs you

News photo

VibeThinker: 3B param model that beats Opus 4.5 on reasoning with novel SFT+GRPO