Get the latest tech news
Congress shouldn’t pass AI protections only rich people can use and ignore the rest of us
Core considerations from digital human rights experts show the gaps between proposals to rein in Non-Consensual Intimate Content and the interests of marginalized communities, youth, and everyday people. By Lia Holland Lia Holland (they/she) is Campaigns and Communications Director at national digital human rights organization Fight for the Future and an abuse survivor. Dealing with […]
Unfortunately, Congress has been failing the people who experience online abuse for years—relying on tech lobbyists, self-interested entertainment tycoons, and organizations from NCOSE to the RIAA that all lack fundamental analysis of the way the Internet actually works or how changes to it impact human rights. To encourage legislators to reimagine current proposals that focus on rights that attorneys will have to continually sue over or that will end up quashing online creativity and critique, we wanted to share some of the core considerations that are surfacing among our colleagues and a read on some of the bills out there today. For over a quarter century, Congress and federal agencies have fundamentally failed to protect our privacy rights in the digital age, allowing stalkers, scammers, and impersonators to thrive on a steady diet of our intimate personal data.
Or read this on r/technology
