Get the latest tech news
Disharmony : When an individual user does it, it’s piracy. When Meta does it…it may just get away with it.
When an individual user does it, it's piracy. When a major company does it...it may just get away with it. At TechCrunch, Kyle Wiggers reports that buried in n
Kadrey v. Meta was brought by novelist Richard Kardrey, writer Christopher Golden, and comedian Sarah Silverberg, and is one of a number of cases accusing technology companies of training language models on copyrighted works without permission. At Techdirt, Mike Masnick begins as an outlier, arguing that many of these changes are actually sensible, though he calls the reasoning behind the Texas move “stupid”, and deplores Zuckerberg’s claim that this is about “free speech” and removing “censorship”. This approach is, however, the opposite of what critics like Open Rights Group have predicted the law will bring; ORG believes that platforms will instead over-moderate in order to stay out of trouble, chilling free speech.
Or read this on r/technology
