Get the latest tech news

Evaluation quirks, metric pitfalls and some recommendations


Evaluation Quirks, Metric Pitfalls and Some Recommendations

3) Optimistic result because of double-counting: By improperly evaluating retrieved instances in an IR setting, the F1 score can rise up to 200% points, kind of exploding the scale which is supposed to end at 100%. For deeper reading, and to help practitioners and researchers with this, I’ve written a paper that explores how to select the right metrics and make more sense of their behavior: Now if you feed a list into this function where the same element accidentally occurs multiple times (can happen in generative AI), go figure!

Get the Android app

Or read this on Hacker News

Read more on:

Photo of recommendations

recommendations

Photo of metric pitfalls

metric pitfalls

Photo of Evaluation quirks

Evaluation quirks

Related news:

News photo

U.S. agency calls for urgent action on Boeing 737 rudder systems | In a series of recommendations, the NTSB says U.S. regulators and Boeing must address potential malfunction in rudder systems

News photo

Amazon’s Audible experiments with AI to improve discovery and recommendations

News photo

UN advisory body makes seven recommendations for governing AI