Get the latest tech news

Judge initially fooled by fake AI citations, nearly put them in a ruling


“Plaintiff’s use of AI affirmatively misled me,” judge writes.

Lacey's lawsuit alleges the insurance company refused to provide legal defense to her late husband, who faced a civil suit after pointing a gun at a group of activists who were on their porch. Legal scholar Eugene Volokh wrote about the incident yesterday, noting "that both of the firms involved (the massive 1,700-lawyer national one and the smaller 45-lawyer predominantly California one) have, to my knowledge, excellent reputations, and the error is not at all characteristic of their work." "From this, I decline to award any of the discovery relief (augmenting a privilege log, ordering production of materials, or requiring in camera review of items) that Plaintiff sought in the proceedings that led up to the bogus briefs."

Get the Android app

Or read this on r/technology

Read more on:

Photo of Judge

Judge

Photo of ruling

ruling

Photo of fake ai citations

fake ai citations

Related news:

News photo

Judge Slams Lawyers For 'Bogus AI-Generated Research'

News photo

Judge puts two-week pause on Trump's mass government layoffs

News photo

How Apple Created a Legal Mess When It Skirted Judge’s Ruling