Get the latest tech news

Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns


he High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT “are not capable of conducting reliable legal research."

In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT “are not capable of conducting reliable legal research.” In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in “Google or Safari.”) Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is “not a precedent.”

Get the Android app

Or read this on TechCrunch

Read more on:

Photo of lawyers

lawyers

Photo of penalties

penalties

Photo of fake AI

fake AI

Related news:

News photo

UK Court Warns Lawyers Can Be Prosecuted Over A.I. Tools That ‘Hallucinate’ Fake Material

News photo

Why do lawyers keep using ChatGPT?

News photo

Deepfake Laws Bring Prosecution and Penalties, but Also Pushback