Get the latest tech news
NIST Draft Guidance Inherently Hostile to Open-Source AI Models
Yesterday, TechFreedom filed comments on the draft guidelines and best practices for AI safety and security issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in response to Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Also pursuant to the Executive Order, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) released a report on the risks, benefits, implications, and suitable policies for open-source AI models.
Yesterday, TechFreedom filed comments on the draft guidelines and best practices for AI safety and security issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in response to Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Also pursuant to the Executive Order, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) released a report on the risks, benefits, implications, and suitable policies for open-source AI models. “NIST and NTIA are sending mixed messages to open-source developers,” concluded Jung.“By failing to apply marginal risk and benefit analysis to open source AI development, NIST’s draft guidance targets open-source models with restrictions that are unduly stricter than alternative systems that pose a similar balance of benefits and risks.
Or read this on Hacker News
