Get the latest tech news

Read the juiciest bits from the Apple-Epic court ruling


Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers is pissed off at Apple. Really, really pissed off. In Rogers' newly released 80-page decision, she took Apple and its

As a result, Apple protected its lucrative App Store business model at the expense of its reputation, its relationship with the iOS developer community, and its good standing in the eyes of the law. “THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that Apple’s abuse of attorney-client privilege designations to delay proceedings and obscure its decision-making process warrants sanction to deter future misconduct. Apple is SANCTIONED in the amount of the full cost of the special masters’ review and Epic’s attorneys’ fees on this issue alone through approximately May 15, 2025, the anticipated date of completion.

Get the Android app

Or read this on TechCrunch

Read more on:

Photo of Apple-Epic

Apple-Epic

Photo of juiciest bits

juiciest bits

Photo of Epic court ruling

Epic court ruling

Related news:

News photo

Read the juiciest bits from the court ruling against Apple over its anticompetitive App Store practices

News photo

Supreme Court declines to hear Apple-Epic antitrust case, meaning app makers can now point customers to the web