Get the latest tech news

Should artists be paid for training data? OpenAI VP wouldn’t say


Onstage at SXSW, Peter Deng, VP of consumer product at OpenAI, wouldn't say whether artists should be compensated for works used to train GenAI models.

OpenAI and other generative AI vendors argue that fair use, the legal doctrine that allows for the use of copyrighted works to make a secondary creation as long as it’s transformative, shields their practice of scraping public data and using it for training without compensating or even crediting artists. “Training AI models using publicly available internet materials is fair use, as supported by long-standing and widely accepted precedents,” writes the company in a January blog post. A class action lawsuit brought by artists including Grzegorz Rutkowski, known for his work on Dungeons & Dragons and Magic: The Gathering, against OpenAI several of its rivals, Midjourney and DeviantArt, is making its way through the courts.

Get the Android app

Or read this on TechCrunch

Read more on:

Photo of Artists

Artists

Photo of training data

training data

Photo of OpenAI VP

OpenAI VP

Related news:

News photo

Experts call for legal ‘safe harbor’ so researchers, journalists and artists can evaluate AI tools

News photo

Tumblr’s owner is striking deals with OpenAI and Midjourney for training data, says report

News photo

According to Dreamworks co-founder Jeffrey Katzenberg, AI will take over 90% of the jobs held by artists working on animated films within the next three years.