Get the latest tech news

The early days of peer review: five insights from historic reports


A crop of referee reports from the Royal Society’s archive reveal discussions about cutting printing costs, reviewer holidays and even editing images.

Chemist Dorothy Hodgkin wrote barely 50 words when asked to review the full manuscript of the structure of DNA by Francis Crick and James Watson in 1953, which was published in Proceedings of the Royal Society in April 1954 1. In her sole comment, beyond a series of yes and no answers, Hodgkin suggests the duo should “touch up” photographs to eliminate distracting reflections of “chairs in the perspex rod” — a technical fix that modern cameras perform routinely. In 1877, reviewer Robert Clifton finished a 24-page report on two related papers on optics, with an apology: “How you will hate me for bothering you with this tremendously long letter, but I hope before we meet time will have softened your anger.”

Get the Android app

Or read this on Hacker News

Read more on:

Photo of insights

insights

Photo of early days

early days

Photo of Peer review

Peer review

Related news:

News photo

Heisenberg and the early days of quantum mechanics (1976) [pdf]

News photo

MM1.5: Methods, Analysis and Insights from Multimodal LLM Fine-Tuning

News photo

Peer review by committee? New journal rethinks old model