Get the latest tech news

What the RIAA lawsuits mean for AI and copyright


The question of fair use is haunting AI music generators

Udio’s platform was used by comedian King Willonius to generate “BBL Drizzy,” the Drake diss track that went viral after producer Metro Boomin remixed it and released it to the public for anyone to rap over. The RIAA’s lawsuits use lofty language, saying that this litigation is about “ensuring that copyright continues to incentivize human invention and imagination, as it has for centuries.” This sounds nice, but ultimately, the incentive it’s talking about is money. The RIAA argues that the startups cannot claim fair use, saying that Suno and Udio’s outputs are meant to replace real recordings, that they are generated for a commercial purpose, that the copying was extensive rather than selective, and finally, that the resulting product poses a direct threat to labels’ business.

Get the Android app

Or read this on The Verge

Read more on:

Photo of copyright

copyright

Photo of RIAA

RIAA

Photo of RIAA lawsuits

RIAA lawsuits

Related news:

News photo

The RIAA’s lawsuit against generative music startups will be the bloodbath AI needs

News photo

Top EU Court Says There’s No Right To Online Anonymity, Because Copyright Is More Important

News photo

UK inertia on LLMs and copyright is 'de facto endorsement'